Discussion:
[PATCH] ath10k: support PCIe enter L1 state
Wen Gong
2018-11-14 02:50:48 UTC
Permalink
QCA6174A/QCA9377 PCIe chips support PCIe L1 and L1SS, and indicate the
L1/L1SS capabilities in PCI configuration space. Currently ath10k driver
write target PCIe config flags to disallow HW enter into L1, this leads
some HW modules are still powered up even when both system PCIe RC and
QCA6174A/QCA9377 endpoint decides to enter into L1 or L1SS.

This cause ~12 mA power drain of bottom power consumption for all scenarios.
Fix this issue by removing the drive code to write PCIe config flags.

Tested with QCA6174 PCI with firmware
WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00109-QCARMSWPZ-1, but this will also affect QCA9377 PCI.
It's not a regression with new firmware releases.

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <***@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 21 ---------------------
1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
index af2cf55..549da7a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
@@ -2301,7 +2301,6 @@ int ath10k_pci_init_config(struct ath10k *ar)
u32 pcie_state_targ_addr = 0;
u32 pipe_cfg_targ_addr = 0;
u32 svc_to_pipe_map = 0;
- u32 pcie_config_flags = 0;
u32 ealloc_value;
u32 ealloc_targ_addr;
u32 flag2_value;
@@ -2374,26 +2373,6 @@ int ath10k_pci_init_config(struct ath10k *ar)
return ret;
}

- ret = ath10k_pci_diag_read32(ar, (pcie_state_targ_addr +
- offsetof(struct pcie_state,
- config_flags)),
- &pcie_config_flags);
- if (ret != 0) {
- ath10k_err(ar, "Failed to get pcie config_flags: %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
- pcie_config_flags &= ~PCIE_CONFIG_FLAG_ENABLE_L1;
-
- ret = ath10k_pci_diag_write32(ar, (pcie_state_targ_addr +
- offsetof(struct pcie_state,
- config_flags)),
- pcie_config_flags);
- if (ret != 0) {
- ath10k_err(ar, "Failed to write pcie config_flags: %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
/* configure early allocation */
ealloc_targ_addr = host_interest_item_address(HI_ITEM(hi_early_alloc));
--
1.9.1
Brian Norris
2018-11-15 00:28:36 UTC
Permalink
Hi Wen,
Post by Wen Gong
QCA6174A/QCA9377 PCIe chips support PCIe L1 and L1SS, and indicate the
L1/L1SS capabilities in PCI configuration space. Currently ath10k driver
write target PCIe config flags to disallow HW enter into L1, this leads
some HW modules are still powered up even when both system PCIe RC and
QCA6174A/QCA9377 endpoint decides to enter into L1 or L1SS.
This cause ~12 mA power drain of bottom power consumption for all scenarios.
Fix this issue by removing the drive code to write PCIe config flags.
Tested with QCA6174 PCI with firmware
WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00109-QCARMSWPZ-1, but this will also affect QCA9377 PCI.
It's not a regression with new firmware releases.
Is there some reason L1 was disabled in the first place? Was it known to
be unreliable?

Brian
Wen Gong
2018-11-15 06:38:25 UTC
Permalink
-----Original Message-----
Norris
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:29 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] ath10k: support PCIe enter L1 state
Hi Wen,
Is there some reason L1 was disabled in the first place? Wa
s it known to be
unreliable?
Hi Brian,
It is a BUG for power, and it is not considered this BUG before.
So this change will fix the bug.
Brian
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
Brian Norris
2018-11-15 18:43:33 UTC
Permalink
This post might be inappropriate. Click to display it.
Kalle Valo
2018-11-16 07:00:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brian Norris
Post by Wen Gong
Is there some reason L1 was disabled in the first place? Was it known to be
unreliable?
Hi Brian,
It is a BUG for power, and it is not considered this BUG before.
So this change will fix the bug.
I understand that the existing behavior is suboptimal for power, but on
the other hand, code that goes out of its way to *clear* the L1 flag
doesn't just pop up out of nowhere. Somebody clearly wrote that! If it
just meant "we didn't verify L1 at first", then maybe it's fine to
enable it unconditionally and see what happens, but if it meant "we
tried L1 on some old chip XXXX and it caused problems", then it would be
nice to know what those problems were.
Or maybe that is hard to figure out, given there's no public git history
tracking the original code, and we just need to try it out.
Yeah, it seems L1 was disabled already on the first ath10k commit:

5e3dd157d7e70 (Kalle Valo 2013-06-12 20:52:10 +0300 2404) pcie_config_flags &= ~PCIE_CONFIG_FLAG_ENABLE_L1;

I don't remember anymore why but my guess is that the proprietary driver
at the time didn't support it with QCA998X. Or maybe QCA988X doesn't
even support L1? Michal, do you remember?

Related to QCA988X supporting L1 state also the commit log is misleading
as it only talks QCA6174/QCA9377, and has been only tested on QCA6174,
but the actual change enables L1 on _all_ PCI and AHB devices. So this
patch needs a lot more testing so that we have confidence that no
existing setups break.
--
Kalle Valo
Michał Kazior
2018-11-16 07:56:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kalle Valo
Post by Brian Norris
Post by Wen Gong
Is there some reason L1 was disabled in the first place? Was it known to be
unreliable?
Hi Brian,
It is a BUG for power, and it is not considered this BUG before.
So this change will fix the bug.
I understand that the existing behavior is suboptimal for power, but on
the other hand, code that goes out of its way to *clear* the L1 flag
doesn't just pop up out of nowhere. Somebody clearly wrote that! If it
just meant "we didn't verify L1 at first", then maybe it's fine to
enable it unconditionally and see what happens, but if it meant "we
tried L1 on some old chip XXXX and it caused problems", then it would be
nice to know what those problems were.
Or maybe that is hard to figure out, given there's no public git history
tracking the original code, and we just need to try it out.
5e3dd157d7e70 (Kalle Valo 2013-06-12 20:52:10 +0300 2404) pcie_config_flags &= ~PCIE_CONFIG_FLAG_ENABLE_L1;
I don't remember anymore why but my guess is that the proprietary driver
at the time didn't support it with QCA998X. Or maybe QCA988X doesn't
even support L1? Michal, do you remember?
Proprietary driver has it ifdef-ed to enable/disable.

Older driver enabled it only for some station-only target/product so
by default QCA988X would build with L1 flag masked out. It made sense
to be conservative and change as little as possible to avoid random
bugs and breakage - so the logic was inherited minus the build-time
ifdef.

However 10.4 driver seems to enable it unconditionally. I'm not sure
if this depends on target firmware in any way or if some other host
driver or bus settings need to be pre-set before L1 can be expected to
work reliably.

I guess there's no way other than testing it out.


Michał

Loading...